Taylor Stuckert and Mark Rembert, 2009 Social Innovation Fellows, founded Energize Clinton County (ECC) in an attempt to save their hometown, Wilmington, Ohio, from economic ruin. Wilmington was home to the largest DHL hub in the world until it closed operations there in 2008, resulting in the loss of 7,000 jobs in a town of 12,000 people. Inspired by Obama, they both quit their jobs in the Peace Corps in 2008 and returned home to devote their lives to revitalizing the city they love.
Last year, Glenn Beck discovered Wilmington and decided he was going to help. On December 15, 2010, Beck hosted his show live from Wilmington where he proceeded to glamorize the town (“It’s a Wonderful Life” was a recurring theme). Stuckert and Rembert met Beck, and Beck decided he liked them in spite of their left leaning political views. He has since made Wilmington a regular talking point on his show and featured Wilmington again on January 21, 2011.
Stuckert and Rembert were recently in New York to meet with Beck. Despite their skepticism (he has promised never to politicize Wilmington again), he continues to remain committed to helping the town and the ECC initiative. Beck’s commitment is a double-edged sword; he’s an incredibly divisive public figure but also the only nationally recognized one to make a long-term commitment to their project. And apparently, Beck’s fans have made Wilmington a must-see destination so the town is actually benefiting financially from this attention.
We asked Stuckert and Rembert to share their thoughts on PopTech’s blog about Beck’s dedication to their work and their hometown.
By Taylor Stuckert and Mark Rembert
Last fall, Glenn Beck was arguably at an all-time high for coverage on blogs, websites, talk shows, and in newspapers. He was a focal point of controversy and his bursts of emotion and contentious zingers were a constant centerpiece on the Daily Show with John Stewart. So we definitely had mixed feelings when we heard the rumor that Glenn Beck was coming to Wilmington to do an event at the Historic Murphy Theatre.
Glenn Beck promised to us, though, that he would not make this a political event. His desire was to share the story of our community’s resilience, innovativeness, and leadership. He said that he saw our community as an inspiration and a model for the rest of the country. How could we disagree with his view of our community? Our work is premised on that view—that many of the solutions to the country’s most pressing challenges are rooted in local communities.
Dr. Gabor Forgacs has taken three dimensional printing to the next level. We’re not talking printing a chair or an architectural prototype but human organs – printing blood vessels, mini livers and nerve grafts cell by cell. Organ printing is one of the latest technologies within the tissue engineering discipline and Forgacs is at the forefront. PopTech spoke with the theoretical physicist turned biophysicist to get a sense of what’s currently possible in the realm of regenerating human cells and tissue, where he envisions the field is headed, and what the long-term implications could be.
PopTech: At the crux of this innovation and beyond just sounding cool, what is the need for 3D organ printing?
Gabor Forgacs: There are 70,000 people right now just in the U.S. waiting for a replacement kidney. There are 5,000 people waiting for a heart. There are people waiting for a liver transplant. And before a suitable donor is found, many of them will be dead. So there is a critical shortage of replacement organs and this interdisciplinary science, this discipline – tissue engineering – works with physicists, medical doctors, biologists, engineers to produce replacement tissue and eventually organs that will help to regenerate the body or to recover body functions that have been lost.
What are the basic elements needed to get the printer to produce blood vessels and tissue?
For ordinary printing [using a desktop printer], you need some ink, a cartridge, paper and a printer. For this, you need the bio-ink, the bio-paper and the bio-printer. The bio-ink, or cell aggregates with composition appropriate for a particular organ, is delivered using a bio-printer in a bio-friendly environment appropriate for the organ and within bio-compatible scaffolding gels that serve as the paper to form 3D tissue constructs.
Dan Ariely just sent us one of his signature videos as an addendum to the concept of adaptation he’d introduced during his PopTech talk this past October. Ariely had spoken candidly about adaptation to pain from his own experience and how severe injuries increase one’s pain threshold. He also shared results from studies he conducted on social adaptation as it relates to assortative mating, or, to put it bluntly, figuring out who’s within someone’s league and who isn’t when it comes to meeting a significant other.
Adaptation comes in another form – professional adaptation. Ariely anecdotally explained that he made a number of small decisions, which led him on his current career path, including clumsily killing a slew of lab rats before he realized that his hands weren’t cut out for physiology. Adaptation is the process by which we maneuver around an environment to figure out what works best for us, he concluded.
If you’re a Dan Ariely fan like we are, why not consider checking out his SXSW panel on Tuesday, March 15 with Sarah Szalavitz, Flexible Morality of User Engagement & User Behavior, or participating in a 15 minute experiment in which the results will be showcased during the panel?
Amidst the current tumult in the Middle East, his thoughts on facilitating political revolutions are particularly relevant.
Why are political revolutions often triggered when a crowd gathers in a public square to challenge the president in his palace? It’s because when people were at home, everyone knew they loathed the dictator but no one knew that other people knew that they knew. Once you assemble in a place where everyone can see everyone else, everyone knows that everyone else knows that everyone else knows that the dictator is loathed and that gives them the collective power to challenge the authority of the dictator who otherwise could pick off dissenters one at a time.
The Wired for Change event that took place this past Wednesday at the Ford Foundation was a jam-packed day filled with heavy hitters ranging from Bill Clinton, who made a surprise appearance to Tim Berners Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web as well as Arianna Huffington, John Maeda, and Damian Kulash amongst others. Coming on the heels of Hillary Clinton’s February 15 speech about Internet freedom, the conference’s focus was to engage in a dialogue about digital rights and the role of technology to facilitate innovation and positive change.
“Will technology’s arc bend toward justice?” Luis Ubinas, Ford Foundation’s President, asked to kick off the day. In a panel moderated by co-founder of BlackPlanet.com Omar Wasow, NAACP President and CEO Ben Jealous, former ZipCar CEO Robin Chase, World Wide Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee and Witness Executive Director Yvette Alberdingk Thijm responded, discussing access to broadband as a basic human right and a ripe opportunity to affect social change. How does access to the Internet funnel directly into innovation (crisis mapping and car sharing platforms) as well as activism (the role of social media in Egypt and Tunisia). The conversation also touched upon net neutrality and the digital divide in our own backyard.
Salient points were made by each panelist:
- Tim Berners-Lee: “The Internet should be neutral” without policing from government or corporations. “I am generally optimistic about the Internet but whenever things get decentralized in any way, then you have a problem.”
- Yvette Alberdingk Thijm: “Just providing the tools isn’t enough.” Access to technology is important for advocacy, but even more important is providing the skills people need to use the tools most effectively. People also need to be trained to use the tools safely so that they won’t implicate themselves or others.
- Ben Jealous: We need to adopt platforms that are being used successfully outside the U.S., like Ushahidi, inside the U.S. “The Internet is the town square” and it’s all about who is in the square. Hopefully those in the square will bend technology’s arc toward justice.
- Robin Chase: “After I fed and clothed a person, I’d give them the Internet…Innovators need free or low cost tools to show their cool new stuff.” With the technology she had available, Chase didn’t have to compete with GM or Ford when she started ZipCar.
There’s always something brewing in the PopTech community. From the world-changing people, projects and ideas in our network, a handful of this week’s highlights follows.
- The unveiling of annual valentines from renowned typographer Marian Bantjes (PopTech 2008) is always a treat. This year is no exception.
- Reihan Salam (PopTech 2009) has a new gig writing about politics at The Daily, a recently launched tablet-native national news brand published exclusively on the iPad.
- Tuesday was the début of The Big Story, a new monthly series featuring New Yorker writers and editors. Every month the The Big Story will chose one story from the magazine and present a live discussion of it in New York City. The first installment featured David Remnick interviewing Malcolm Gladwell (PopTech 2004, 2008) about his recent piece on college rankings.
- Josh Nesbit (Social Innovation Fellow 2009) was featured as part of ABC News’ “Be the Change: Save a Life” initiative, a year-long series of broadcast and digital coverage focusing on global health issues. Nesbit co-founded FrontlineSMS:Medic and HopePhones to bring the innovative use of mobile phones for healthcare to the developing world. We also spotted Ken Banks (Social Innovation Fellow 2008), and the artwork of Chris Jordan (PopTech 2007, 2009).
- Finally, congratulations to PopTech board member John Legend (PopTech 2007, 2010) on 3 Grammy wins last Sunday!
Image: Marian Bantjes
In our hectic lives, days pass into weeks into years. But how often are we confronted with evidence of a world from thousands of years prior, when glaciers covered the earth and we were evolving into what we’ve become today? Actually, much more often than we think. Evidence of the most recent geologic epoch preceding the current era we’re in – from 2,588,000 to 12,000 years BP and known as the Pleistocene – is all around us. Its omnipresence forces us to reconsider how we move through time and space.
Organizations such as the Long Now Foundation, which fosters long-term thinking and responsibility in the framework of the next 10 thousand years, and The Mannahatta Project, which illustrates the original ecology of Manhattan prior to its metamorphosis by European settlers, help widen our purview. And a project called Friends of the Pleistocene (FOP), run by artists and graphic designers Jamie Kruse and Elizabeth Ellsworth, aims to bring greater awareness of the materials and landscapes that originated during the Pleistocene, which we encounter every day. In addition to helping us rethink how we travel through the world and evoking a sense of mystery to our often overlooked environment, their projects move us to consider the evidence we’ll be leaving behind for the next epoch.
PopTech: The FOP website states that the project explores the “conjuncture between landscape and contemporary human activity at sites shaped by the geologic epoch of the Pleistocene.” Could you elaborate further?
Jamie Kruse: We’re interested in how humans have evolved in response to landscape over the past ten thousand years. We started thinking about the Pleistocene during research trips as artists in the American West. We were encountering landscapes where you could still see the effects of the geologic era of the Pleistocene on the surface of the earth primarily in the form of ancient lake beds, which have been used a lot for runways and bombing ranges. We started to realize that geologic landscapes have been put to use in very different ways by contemporary humans than they were used in the past so that’s where we started with FOP.
Seventeen year old high school junior Alex Godin was a crowd-pleaser when he presented his 5-minute, 20-slide, no-nonsense talk at Ignite NYC last week, Highschool in the Age of the Hacker: What’s Wrong and What’s Right with the High School System. Quoting Ralph Waldo Emerson, John D. Rockefeller and referencing the movie Office Space, Godin expressed emphatically that, “Hackers don’t care what the rest of the world thinks….They build something great.” Coming on the heels of winning the grand prize at NY Tech Meetup’s Startup weekend, this kid is worth keeping an eye on.
Your anatomy and physiology lesson for the day:
Google Body is a detailed 3D model of the human body. You can peel back anatomical layers, zoom in, click to identify anatomy, or search for muscles, organs, bones and more. You can also share the exact scene you are viewing by copying and pasting the URL.
We’re usually not at a loss for words to describe how we feel – as many of us experienced yesterday with expressions of love aplenty for Valentine’s Day. But what if we try to visually represent the emotions that are running through our body? That’s the question graphic designer Orlagh O’Brien was looking to answer with Emotionally}Vague, a project named “in honor of the people who don’t know how they feel.”
In a survey, O’Brien asked 250 people to represent five emotions – anger, joy, fear, sadness, and love – through words, color, and drawings of dots, lines and arrows on a human silhouette. She planned to gather the data and then figure out how to visually represent the responses. As the results trickled in, O’Brien realized, as she explained at PopTech, “there was enough data from what people were drawing to suggest patterns of feelings.”
To show those patterns, O’Brien layered the drawn responses over one another with enough transparency to obtain the collective essence of the each emotion. On love, Orlagh recently elaborated:
Love is spread evenly around the body, similar to the whole body sensation of joy. It has the widest range outside the boundary of the body, far more so than the other emotions, suggesting the greatest reach to the world around.