A number of members of the PopTech community have been named to Forbes' "30 Under 30" list of people who are changing the world.
On example is Josh Nesbit, who has been a very active member of the PopTech community for years. Forbes praised Nesbit's Medic Mobile, which pioneered the use of mobile phones for healthcare, starting in a remote region of Malawi.
Nesbit was a PopTech Social Innovation Fellow back in 2009, participating in one of PopTech's programs designed to help cultivate the work of promising innovators and bring their work to scale. Nesbit also gave a talk at PopTech's annual conference in 2010.
In 2013, Nesbit returned to the PopTech annual convening, this time to mark his work as the first recipient of a disbursement from PopTech's Impact Fund — a program committed to leveraging resources and providing small catalyst investments that seed new initiatives that have high potential for disruptive impact. Nesbit received the support for his work with Raj Panjabi, a 2010 PopTech Social Innovation Fellow. Panjabi co-founded Last Mile Health, which forges innovative partnerships between rural health centers and their surrounding communities. The model features community health workers trained to treat patients in remote locations.
2013 PopTech Science Fellow Christina Agapakis made Forbes' list as well. Agapakis is a microbiologist who makes cheese from bacteria collected in unusual places, such as from the human body. Armpits. Mouths. Between toes.
Forbes celebrates the work of Daniella Witten. She works in statistical machine learning, a field at the interface of statistics and computer science. In addition to her research, Witten has written a book intended to make cutting-edge statistical machine learning techniques more accessible. Witten was a 2013 PopTech Science Fellow.
Forbes also recognizes Tevis Howard who founded KOMAZA, a profitable microforestry social enterprise, to help end extreme poverty for rural Kenyan families living in arid landscapes. Howard was a PopTech Social Innovation Fellow in 2008.
The Bellagio/PopTech Fellows program brings together five to six individuals from diverse backgrounds for a two-week immersion at the Rockefeller Foundation’s renowned Bellagio Center on the shores of Lake Como, Italy. The program’s first set of Fellows brought many new insights to bear on using big data to enhance community resilience.
The 2014 program is focused on reinventing and democratizing livelihoods. The Fellows will explore how global economies are changing, the potential benefits and challenges of moving from big manufacturing to a distributed model, the opportunities unlocked by the emergence of sharing economies, and how to ensure citizens, in particular poor and vulnerable populations, are well prepared to participate in these ever-changing contexts.
This effort will be creative, interdisciplinary and collaborative – providing an environment where emerging tools, approaches and solutions are viewed as an art as much as a science.
The program is seeking candidates from relevant fields such as design, economics, technology, art and social innovation. A diverse cohort of Fellows will be chosen for their technical and creative excellence and their demonstrated ability to work and think across disciplines.
Know someone who might be a good fit? Nominations will be accepted through January 30, 2014, via the online nomination form. Candidates may self-nominate or be nominated by someone else. Eligibility details are available on the call for nominations web page.
As part of a fellows program several years ago, social innovation pioneer Ken Banks found himself at Stanford University where he was surrounded by young students studying social entrepreneurship. When Banks asked them about the focus of their academic work, those students responded that they were trying to learn the skills they needed to go out and change the world for the better.
This struck Banks as a noble academic pursuit, but also a little odd. After all, Banks had been a successful innovator in that field since the 1990s. In 2005 he released FrontlineSMS, one of the most effective text messaging field communication systems available that is now in use in more than 150 countries worldwide.
But rather than classroom preparation, Banks came up with his successful innovation after growing increasingly frustrated with faulty communications in the field and deciding to do something about it. “My only qualification was that I’d spent enough time in the field understanding the problem I was solving, and that I knew how to code,” Banks told PopTech. “I didn’t go on an innovation course, or take a qualification in social entrepreneurship.”
That kind of hands-on, fieldwork ethos is a central thrust in Banks’ new book, “The Rise of the Reluctant Innovator,” a collection of essays by successful social entrepreneurs edited by Banks. Banks also penned the introduction, which includes the advice, “The only qualifications you need to change the world are a little hope, faith and determination.” Banks also serves as faculty for PopTech’s Social Innovation Fellows program.
Hands-on experience is a unifying feature among the innovators featured in Banks’ book. (That list includes Brij Kothari, Erik Hersman, Joel Selanikio and Laura Stachel, among others). This isn’t so much disdain for the growing institutionalization of social innovation as it is a strong conviction that extensive fieldwork is an essential part of doing the job well. This echoes the guidance of other legendary social enterprisers, like Paul Polak, who have long emphasized deep, personal familiarity with a stubborn challenge as opposed to ivory tower social innovation from afar. “You may be the person best-qualified to solve a particular problem in the world, but that’s of little use if you don’t find it,” Banks writes. “There are very few short cuts other than to leave your comfort zone and get yourself out there.”
Empathy and grit are two other common characteristics among Banks’ innovators. And those traits are central to his use of the term “reluctant” to describe the entrepreneurs in his book, rather than, say, “accidental.” Banks explained to PopTech that the innovators profiled in “Rise” also discovered sticky problems in the field and are people who are “fundamentally disturbed, angered or frustrated at what they see.” They are determined to help. He writes in his book: “Many of these people weren’t looking for a cause to occupy their time or dominate their lives. The easy option isn’t the one they took. They took the hard one for the greater good.”
There are other common attributes among the kinds of pioneers featured in “Rise.” Banks says the most successful of these innovators try to leave their egos behind when they pack their bags and head off to some remote area. “It always saddens me when I think of the progress that could be made if people weren’t so busy worrying about who gets the credit,” he said. “To succeed, social innovators need to be selfless, open, egoless and always looking at the bigger picture.”
That’s not to say that there isn’t value in studying social innovation as an academic pursuit at a place like Stanford. But Banks and his coterie of innovators say that the big breakthroughs are more likely to come far from its hallowed campus. “To really understand the world and to find something that truly switches you on,” Banks said, “You need to get out and experience it.”
"The Rise of the Reluctant Innovator" is available from Nov. 20th in all good bookshops, and via Amazon and other online retailers. Further details can be found at www.reluctantinnovation.com.
The latest PopTech Edition focuses on community as the central element in this deep examination of the tenets of urban resilience. PopTech is releasing this Edition to coincide with the one-year anniversary of Hurricane Sandy slamming into the East Coast.
This collection of in-depth articles and videos examines the basic definitions that help us study resilience, explores common attributes of communities that seem to bounce back and it begins to unpack some of the key cutting-edge techniques and technologies in the field.
While community is the nucleus of this Edition, the constellation of information brought to that concept is markedly diverse. The opinions come from a distinctly multi-disciplinary panel of experts in an effort to bring the broadest possible aperture to subject matter that is pressing, complicated and difficult to define and measure.
The format varies widely as well. “The City Resilient: Enabling communities to bound back” is a formidable blend of videos of prepared talks, interviews and short documentary films, as well as written pieces submitted by outside writers and text profiles of a handful of provocative resilience innovators.
The videos and articles attempt to examine such fundamental issues as the definition of community in the 21st century and how to measure resilience. The authors and speakers delve into the preparation, response and recovery from sudden, intense disasters like killer storms, as well as slower, creeping afflictions like economic decline. And finally, the group of experts weighs the best ways to manage the complex web of overlapping authorities and institutions before, during and after a crisis.
Each PopTech Edition explores an emerging theme from the perspective of some of the remarkable innovators shaping it. This particular Edition grew out of an urban resilience summit by PopTech and the Rockefeller Foundation at the Brooklyn Academy of Music in June 2013. Please enjoy PopTech’s fourth Edition, “The City Resilient.”
Day three of PopTech consisted of a series of “immersions,” opportunities to engage in structured discussions on pressing topics of innovation, study the creative process with a pair of skilled artists, or go out on a selection of Maine-oriented activities from sailing to chowder making.
In one of these immersions, Artist Shantell Martin and self-described “nerd artist researcher hacker” Zach Lieberman invited a small group of around 10 PopTech attendees to explore the creative process and work on a series of exercises to provoke visual creativity. Gathering in a sunlit room of the historic Camden Opera House, the pair spent two hours discussing creativity, drawing, instructing and talking.
Lieberman described the instruction as “exercises around conditional design.” They began with simple tasks of collaborative drawing using only straight lines and dots, and then into creating drawings out of one long, continuous line. “Lines can tell us where we come from. Lines can tell us where we are going,” Lieberman said. “I think there is something really beautiful about an infinite line.”
Martin shared an intimate treat with the small class. She invited the participants into a large room hung with tall sheets of white paper. She then created one of her trademark, large-scale black-and-white drawings using thick black magic marker.
The whole time, Martin described what she was doing, what she was thinking and invited the clearly enthralled audience to ask whatever they liked about the process. “Thinking that you are finished and feeling like you are finished are two different things,” she explained near the end of her work.
The immersions were the last wrinkle in “Sparks of Brilliance.” See you next year in Camden.
Photos by PopTech.
Day two of PopTech 2013 featured a deep dive into the mysterious origins of creativity inside the human brain and some examination of creativity in fields as diverse as science, medicine, photography and business.
Cognitive psychologist Scott Barry Kaufman is working to unravel some of those mysterious origins. He is deeply immersed in research that is rapidly mapping out the creative process inside the human brain with the help of brain scanning equipment. Kaufman explored with the Camden audience the specific portions of the brain that activate and deactivate during creativity and how those patterns differ in some highly creative people.
The precuneous, for example, is a region of the brain heavily involved in “looking in,” or producing and following thoughts such as daydreams or thinking about the future. Other parts of the brain are “looking out,” or paying attention to the outside world as we go about our business.
For most of us, our brains concentrate largely on one or the other. “The more that you are focusing on your inner stream of chatter, you are oblivious to what is going on out there,” Kaufman explained as an example.
But brain scans of particularly creative people show they are actually doing more of both at the same time. They are able to “simultaneously activate these two brain networks,” Kaufman said.
Just as deeply as Kaufman is interested in some of the good things going on inside our brains, brain cancer researcher Jim Olson has come up with some potentially revolutionary ways of getting something bad out: cancer.
Olson has invented “tumor paint,” that lights up cancer cells, showing surgeons precisely what to cut out while leaving healthy cells in place. The paint is based on the venom of a scorpion and is 100,000 times more sensitive than an MRI in detecting cancer cells.
Tumor paint illuminates brain, prostate, breast, colon, skin and other cancers and human clinical trials are set to begin in Australia late this year. “In a few years, surgeons will have a hard time going back to surgery as they have done it in the past,” he said.
A series of speakers also brought the Camden audience along on an exploration of some of the creative processes at work in a variety of other fields.
Photographer Adam Magyar develops ingenious digital camera systems and employs high-tech, digital tools adapted from industrial applications. He is particularly interested in urban environments and city dwellers. His riveting work transforms otherwise mundane situations into compelling and magical images. “I was always interested in the rest — the unimportant moments,” he told the audience. ‘I always capture a lot of details. I love details.”
Similarly David Robertson, a professor at the Wharton School, used the history of innovation at LEGO to show how creativity sometimes needs boundaries to excel. At LEGO, this has meant disciplined market research before inventing new toys and forcing designers to work within relatively strict parameters.
Robertson admits that the trick is knowing how much to let business creativity bloom and how much to set some limits. “It is a hard balance. A lot of companies get it wrong,” he admitted. LEGO is getting it right. Profits are soaring.
Lisa Servon, who conducts research on urban poverty, community development and economic development, brings hands-on creativity to her work trying to develop financial tools that are useful to poorer Americans. Part of that work has involved Servon working at a check-cashing facility in the Bronx. “Poor people know best what they need,” she said. “It is not the policy makers and the researchers.”
They joined a full slate of speakers and PopTech Fellows who took the stage in Camden to help the audience better understand the creative process in all its glory. See you next year in Camden.
Photos by PopTech.
How could communities make better use of big data to enhance their resilience?
The six Bellagio/PopTech Fellows convened this past August at the Rockefeller Foundation’s Bellagio Center to look deeply at how data can help communities bounce back in the face of key stresses — environmental, political, social and economic.
Building on their multidisciplinary backgrounds, and spurred on by several catalysts, the Fellows created a fresh approach that emphasizes ethics as a central — and often overlooked — factor.
Today, at PopTech, the Fellows announced “Big Data, Communities and Ethical Resilience: A Framework for Action,” which outlines the interplay of six key domains, including ethics, governance, science, technology, place and sociocultural context.
The framework is already generating original ideas on how communities can more appropriately sense, analyze and utilize data, while respecting the autonomy and privacy of community members. We are excited to share the Fellows’ vision, and look forward to the practical applications that are beginning to emerge.
A raft of data supports the public health approach to preventing violence and cultivating peace. Treating violence like a communicable disease that spreads rapidly among people and groups provides a proven effective stratagem for tracking and interrupting an outbreak and preventing further spread.
For years, those kinds of violence interdiction efforts have utilized “boots on the ground,” relying mostly on the physical efforts of trained personnel who go out to trouble spots and leverage their local knowledge and contacts in communities to help tamp down outbreaks of violence or prevent it in the first place.
In March, just five years after vicious post-election violence rattled Kenya, a similar contagion-style effort was employed there during and after elections, which this time proceeded peacefully for a variety of reasons. But there was a twist in this violence prevention effort: It may have been the first time that mobile phones were used to expand the reach and impact of the disease-control approach to preventing violence.
That exercise included a hybrid of research in the field long before the elections, personal networking in tandem with the use of mobile phones, sharp discipline in the vetting of intelligence on potential violence, and careful diligence in text messaging. These techniques may provide an invaluable blueprint if that high-tech violence-interruption model goes to scale at other locations around the world.
PeaceTXT is a PopTech-initiated collaborative effort to understand how new communication technologies can be integrated with face-to-face violence prevention to reach scale. PeaceTXT is a cooperative endeavor that began by looking at how the mobile phone might be used as a fulcrum in PeaceTXT partner CureViolence’s approach to violence prevention. CureViolence worked in Chicago to explore the possibility of using text messaging to amplify their approach and to identify possible communications mediums that could be used for violence prevention.
Sisi ni Amani Kenya is an organization founded specifically to enhance local peace-building in Kenya with a text-message-based approach to civic education and violence prevention, and received support from PeaceTXT to further develop and scale its model. The program also relies heavily on the technological expertise of the Praekelt Foundation, Medic Mobile and QCRI.
During the 2013 elections, Sisi Ni Amani implemented its programming on the ground and across mobile networks. The organization was established, in part, in response to the devastatingly effective use of mobile phones in 2007 to spread rumors and stoke political violence. “If our approach to using mobile technology is modeled after anything, it is from the people who wanted to cause violence in 2007, and did it really effectively,” said Founder Rachel Brown.
But members of the Sisi Ni Amani team emphasize that local intelligence, networking and knowledge were every bit as important as the use of the mobile technology, and that the messages might have been useless — or worse, potentially inflammatory — without it. “Some of the places where we are working, we have lived there,” explained George Ooko, one of the Sisi Ni Amani coordinators who spent the election season embedded in Kenyan neighborhoods armed with a cell phone, three extra cell phone batteries and a spare charger.
When text messages are sent, they have to be carefully formulated to consider local language and mores. Each 160-word text, in fact, is vetted by a small group of local volunteers before it is sent, in order to maximize impact and minimize the risk of untoward results. “You have to be very careful which word you use,” said Ooko, who is attending PopTech in Camden. (Sisi Ni Amani also relies on deep local knowledge to carefully vet incoming intelligence on potential violence through a variety of sources.)
The texting that did take place was also highly disciplined and targeted. Messages could be sent to users in specific geographic areas, allowing messages to be tailored for particular threats and using language most likely to prove effective to a niche audience. Sisi Ni Amani also learned some valuable lessons about limiting overall messages to avoid overload, and sending messages at the most effective times of day.
But surprisingly, Ooko and his colleagues say that one of the most important facets of their election work was determining when not to send a text. Mary Njambi, another Sisi Ni Amani coordinator attending PopTech, described receiving reports from voters who said they were being locked out of a voting facility. In that case, Sisi Ni Amani decided it was better to contact local elections officials directly, and no text was needed. In other cases, the organization delivered intelligence directly to police. “You shouldn’t always send a message,” Njambi said.
All of that discipline may have helped, and Sisi Ni Amani’s statistics from the election are impressive. Around 65,000 Kenyans signed up to receive messages during the elections. The group sent out more than 680,000 text messages during the election season. A Sisi Ni Amani post-election survey showed that 46 percent of respondents forwarded a Sisi Ni Amani message to others. Around 85 percent of respondents reported talking with others about messages, and 92 percent reported that the messages had a positive impact.
PeaceTXT is an effort that grew out of a markedly diverse group of collaborators. CureViolence, for example, early on dispatched their international director to Nairobi to help Sisi Ni Amani incorporate the disease-control model into their high-tech hybrid. “We had a disease-control approach, the same as you would have for tuberculosis, cholera or AIDS,” said Josh Gryniewicz, the director of communications at CureViolence. “How do we amplify the work? That is here SMS came in.”
Gryniewicz also acknowledged PopTech’s leadership spearheading the work of PeaceTXT over the last several years. “None of this would have happened without PopTech,” he said.
PeaceTXT will be sharing its experiences and methodologies in the coming months and will continue to work toward the development of an integrated model of violence interruption and prevention that builds on the success of the early work in Chicago and Kenya.
Josh Nesbit, a PopTech Social Innovation Fellow in 2009, pioneered the use of mobile phones for health care in a remote region of Malawi. He then went on to co-found Medic Mobile, which is bringing these innovations to broader parts of the developing world. The model features a central clinic laptop running FrontlineSMS software, enabling community health workers to use mobile phones to coordinate patient care.
Raj Panjabi was a PopTech Social Innovation Fellow the next year, in 2010. He co-founded Last Mile Health, which forges innovative partnerships between rural health centers and their surrounding communities. The model features dispatching community health workers trained to treat patients in remote locations.
At PopTech’s annual convening in Camden this year, it was announced that the pair are the first to receive support from the PopTech Impact Fund — a program committed to leveraging resources and providing small catalyst investments that seed new initiatives that have high potential for disruptive impact. It is one of the ways PopTech nurtures its network of change agents and precipitates collaborative endeavors.
Through the Fund, Nesbit and Panjabi plan to combine the power of their two programs. The idea is to equip Panjabi’s remote community health care workers with the technological tools utilized in Nesbit’s program. This has the potential to dramatically improve the delivery of health care by providing those health care workers with virtual access to medical expertise and coordinating capabilities they would not otherwise have in remote locations. “Do we have the moral imagination to make things better?” Nesbit asked the Camden crowd. And Panjabi seemed to answer: “We have a chance right now to change the way an entire country cares for its people in the most remote areas.”